July 1, 2026
December 1, 2025
Maximilian Kiener, Jonas Bozenhard, Gitta Astrid Hildegard Kutyniok, Sven Nyholm
AI ethics has matured as a field, yet its concepts and tools have been developed almost entirely with digital AI in mind. Emerging “analog” AI approaches, that is, systems that compute over continuous, rather than binary, signals, challenge this digital default. Analog AI promises substantial energy savings and alternative modes of information processing. However, it also departs in ethically significant ways from the widely discussed digital AI systems such that its differences from digital AI could mean that current ethical frameworks may not address analog AI’s unique challenges. This paper highlights how the distinctive characteristics of analog AI raise new ethical questions that require careful consideration. We examine four key areas of AI ethics, namely fairness, privacy, explainability, and safety, and propose a roadmap for the ethical examination of analog AI. Our aim is to lay the foundation for an important but hitherto unrecognized subfield within AI ethics: the ethics of analog AI.
The ethics of analog AI
Maximilian Kiener, Jonas Bozenhard, Gitta Astrid Hildegard Kutyniok, Sven Nyholm
AI Ethics 6, 27 (2026)
December 1, 2025

Maximilian Kiener, Jonas Bozenhard, Gitta Astrid Hildegard Kutyniok, Sven Nyholm
AI Ethics 6, 27 (2026)
December 1, 2025
